Commonwealth Parole Board (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading

Opened the debate

Rowland argued that the bill establishes the Commonwealth Parole Board to handle parole decisions for federal offenders, removing this function from the Attorney-General. Rowland stated that the amendments align with best practices by granting the board discretion to defer decisions when suitable accommodation is not finalised or further information is needed. Rowland explained that this flexibility prevents perverse outcomes where offenders are refused parole due to rigid statutory timeframes, such as the 12-month reconsideration rule. Rowland noted that this allows offenders time to complete treatment programs, such as sex offender courses, before a decision is made. Rowland emphasised that the bill maintains statutory protections while ensuring procedural fairness and efficient decision-making.

Government response

Rowland moved that the bill be read a second time, outlining its purpose to support the establishment of the Commonwealth Parole Board. Rowland detailed how the bill transfers decision-making powers from the Attorney-General to the board, including authority over parole orders and licence breaches. Rowland highlighted changes that provide discretion to manage statutory deadlines, aiming to improve rehabilitation and reintegration outcomes. Rowland stated that these amendments balance flexibility with statutory protections for offenders. Rowland commended the bill to the House, noting that transitional provisions would ensure a seamless transfer of functions.