Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Commonwealth Parole Board Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 8 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Attorney-General moved the second reading of the bill to establish an independent Commonwealth Parole Board. The proposal aims to replace the Attorney-General as the decision-maker for federal offender parole with a board of experts to enhance community safety and remove political influence. The debate concluded with the motion being carried, as no other members spoke.

Outcome

The motion for the second reading was agreed to, and the debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Rowland argued that establishing an independent board would ensure parole decisions are made by experts rather than politicians, thereby strengthening public trust. Rowland noted that the number of federal parole decisions has risen significantly, reaching over 530 in the 2024 to 2025 period, and that the offender cohort now includes higher-risk individuals such as terrorists and child sex offenders. The bill aligns with recommendations from the Australian Law Reform Commission and brings federal practice in line with state and international standards. Rowland emphasised that the board would maintain strict supervision conditions to minimise reoffending while ensuring procedural fairness and transparency through annual reporting.

Government response

Rowland stated that the board would include a chair, deputy chair, and a minimum of three sessional members appointed by the Governor-General for terms of up to five years. Rowland explained that the bill ensures the board's independence by prohibiting direction from any person and limiting termination of members to serious matters such as misbehaviour or incapacity. The legislation retains the statutory prohibition on parole for terrorist offenders unless exceptional circumstances justify release. A legislative review is scheduled to commence three years after the board's commencement to assess its effectiveness.