Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 4 September 2025

Continued from Wednesday 3 September 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Members of the Australian Labor Party supported the appropriation bills, arguing they funded essential government priorities including healthcare, housing, education, and local infrastructure. Alicia Payne highlighted national fiscal management and specific investments in Canberra, such as a new convention precinct, healthcare upgrades, and defence industry support. Sarah Witty focused on the impact of student debt relief, housing affordability measures, and cultural investments in Melbourne. Both speakers emphasised that the bills reflected the government's commitment to fairness and delivering on election promises.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Alicia Payne (Canberra) (Australian Labor Party) ALP

Payne argued that the bills demonstrated responsible budget management and delivered on commitments to reduce living costs and improve services. Payne highlighted national achievements such as budget surpluses, climate action, and the establishment of the National Anti-Corruption Commission. Payne detailed specific investments for Canberra, including a $200 million convention and entertainment precinct, upgrades to the National Hockey Centre, and funding to boost bulk-billing rates for general practitioners. Payne also noted investments in electrification programs, road infrastructure, and the local defence industry, alongside the establishment of the Centre for Disease Control in the capital.