Question Time AU

General Debate

Fossil Fuel Industry

House of Representatives · Monday 25 August 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Greens to cancel the government's approval of Woodside's North West Shelf gas extension and impose a moratorium on new coal and gas projects. The Greens argued the approval exacerbated the climate crisis and demonstrated undue corporate influence over politics, citing significant donations and tax avoidance by energy companies. The Labor Party opposed the motion, defending the approval as part of a broader strategy to reduce emissions through renewable energy investments and safeguard mechanism reforms, while criticising the Greens for past obstruction of climate legislation. The National Party also opposed the motion, emphasising the economic benefits of the project, including royalties and jobs, and arguing that rigorous environmental assessments had been completed.

Outcome

The motion was not put to a vote as it was part of a general debate.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Watson-Brown argued that the government's rapid approval of the North West Shelf gas project extension to 2070 represented a betrayal of climate commitments and demonstrated excessive corporate influence. Watson-Brown noted that the project would generate annual emissions exceeding those of all existing coal-fired power plants combined and highlighted that Woodside had donated over $1 million to the Labor Party since 2014. Watson-Brown called for the cancellation of the draft approval, a moratorium on new fossil fuel projects, and reforms to address corporate lobbying and tax avoidance, citing examples of gas exporters paying no tax despite billions in revenue.