Opened the debate
Steggall moved the second reading motion, arguing that the bill was necessary to protect communities and the economy from escalating climate risks through independent assessments and a funded adaptation plan. Steggall highlighted that disaster costs were projected to double by 2060 and that household expenses from extreme weather would rise significantly. Steggall criticised the government for withholding the completed National Climate Risk Assessment and for spending only a small portion of the disaster budget on resilience. Steggall urged parliament to legislate a framework that ensured transparency, accountability, and long-term preparation regardless of political changes.