Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Criminal Code Amendment (Using Technology to Generate Child Abuse Material) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 28 July 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned a private member's bill to criminalise the downloading and use of artificial intelligence tools designed to generate child sexual abuse material. Independent members Kate Chaney and Zali Steggall argued that existing laws contained urgent gaps regarding AI-generated content, which could be deleted before detection. They highlighted that similar legislation was being introduced in the United Kingdom and the European Union, warning that Australia risked falling behind without immediate action. Both speakers emphasised that while AI offers benefits, specific tools for generating abuse material have no legitimate purpose and require immediate legislative prohibition.

Outcome

The transcript does not state the final result of the vote or the bill's passage.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Chaney moved the second reading of the bill, arguing it addressed an urgent gap in the Criminal Code by targeting AI tools designed specifically to generate child abuse material. Chaney noted that while possessing images is illegal, the ability to infinitely produce and delete such content via AI presents a new threat that hinders law enforcement efforts. Chaney cited reports indicating that non-consensual explicit generative AI tools had become a monetised business with millions of visits. Chaney argued that regulating AI broadly is complex, but this specific measure was necessary to protect children while broader frameworks were developed. Chaney called for urgent government action to plug this hole, noting that the current national strategy on child sexual abuse did not cover these emerging harms.