Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Environment

House of Representatives · Thursday 24 July 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the government's handling of a prolonged algal bloom in the Gulf of St Vincent, which has caused significant marine mortality and economic hardship for local fishing and tourism industries. Opposition members criticised the delay in government action and highlighted the negative impacts of renewable energy projects and water management policies on regional communities. Government members defended their record, citing substantial funding commitments and legislative reforms, while accusing the opposition of climate denialism and failing to act during their previous term. The discussion also touched on the Murray-Darling Basin Plan and the coalition's internal divisions regarding net zero targets.

Outcome

No vote was taken as this was a Matter of Public Importance.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Bell argued that the government had failed to respond to scientists' requests for $4 million over 10 years to monitor the Great Southern Reef and algal blooms, despite 18 months of warnings. Bell stated that the bloom had killed 13,800 marine creatures since March 2025 and affected over 400 species, causing severe economic damage to local fishing and tourism businesses. Bell claimed that commercial fishing had ceased in some areas and that tourist revenues had dropped significantly, with some businesses losing over $1,000 a day. Bell criticised the government's delayed response and characterised the recent funding announcement as insufficient and politically motivated.

Government response

Wilson stated that the government had committed $14 million, matched by the South Australian government, to address the algal bloom, following previous investments in science and restoration. Wilson argued that climate change influences such events and highlighted the government's commitment to net zero by 2050 and increased emission reduction targets. Wilson listed environmental achievements, including reforms to the EPBC Act, funding for threatened species, and the expansion of marine protected areas, noting that Australia now protects 52 per cent of its ocean domain. Wilson accused the opposition of ignoring the Graeme Samuel review and failing to reform environmental laws during their nine years in government.

Opposition response

Webster argued that the government's environmental approach was driven by political targets rather than outcomes, citing the algal bloom as evidence of failure. Webster claimed that water buybacks in the Murray-Darling Basin contributed to nutrient-rich floodwaters that exacerbated the bloom. Webster criticised the rollout of renewable energy projects, stating that wind turbines and solar panels were destroying prime agricultural land and threatening local ecosystems. Webster cited concerns from community members about the environmental devastation and social division caused by net zero policies.