Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2024; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 6 February 2025

Continued from Tuesday 4 February 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on introducing a new scheme to protect Commonwealth frontline workers from violence and aggression. The member for Blair argued that the legislation addresses a critical safety gap by enabling courts to issue workplace protection orders against individuals who threaten or harm staff. The bill was supported as a necessary measure to implement recommendations from a security review and to ensure safe working conditions for public servants. The House agreed to the second reading, and the bill was reported without amendment.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time and reported to the House without amendment.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Neumann argued that the bill was essential for protecting Commonwealth workers who face increasing risks of violence and aggression from the public. Neumann stated that the legislation mimics similar protective frameworks in Queensland and other jurisdictions, allowing courts to issue orders that prevent individuals from accessing workplaces or contacting specific staff. Neumann highlighted that the bill implements recommendation 17 of the Ashton review, which identified 44 changes needed to improve frontline safety. Neumann explained that the scheme covers a wide range of entities, including Services Australia and the Australian Taxation Office, and extends protection to contractors and workers in various locations. Neumann noted that breaching an order would constitute a criminal offence with penalties including imprisonment, and that the act would be reviewed three years after commencement.